Bruno Marchal wrote:
> A priori the first one: " [17 is prime] is independent of me". But now > I accept also the first order predicate rule that if someone prove "17 > is prime", he can infer "Ex(x is prime)", so that I can take the > proposition "it exists a number which is prime" as independent of me > too. > I don't interpret "numbers existence" in any substantial way like if > there was a place and a time where you can observe the number 17 > sitting on some chair ... So how do insubstantial numbers generate a substantial world ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
