Hi, I've checked and I do not see an absolute meaning to perfection. Le Samedi 5 Août 2006 13:12, W. C. a écrit : > Good question. But I don't think we need to define "perfect". > You can check the dictionary to know its meaning. > Your killing example won't exist in the PU. Otherwise it won't be PU.
It won't be in *your view* of *your* PU... That shows that PU notion has no meaning... or I should say the meaning is tied to the person who think of it. Regards, Quentin > >From: [email protected] The problem with perfection is that > >this word has *no* absolute meaning. > > > >Then depending on your culture/history it can have a different meaning. > > > >Stupid example: Imagine you are a serial killer... perfect world for you > >would be a world were you can kill at will ;) But you would say that a > >serial killer cannot be in a perfect world (I'd say he cannot be in your > >perfect world, not his). > > > >So unless there exists an absolute meaning of perfection, PU seems > >impossible or I should say meaningless. > > > >Quentin > > _________________________________________________________________ > No masks required! Use MSN Messenger to chat with friends and family. > http://go.msnserver.com/HK/25382.asp > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
