Brent Meeker writes:

> David Nyman wrote:
> > Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Perhaps it says something about the nature of the simulation's creators,
> >>but I don't see that it says anything about the probability that we are
> >>living in one.
> > 
> > 
> > Do you mean that if we are living in one, then the moral standards of
> > its creators are reprehensible (to our way of thinking) or at least
> > opaque?  
> But the hypothesis that the creators are like us is part of the 
> justification for supposing they would run simulations of intelligent 
> beings.  If you then argue that their motivations and ethics might be alien 
> to us, you've discarded any reason for supposing they would simulate us.

They're not just simulating us, are they? They might have just slapped 
together a virtual universe in an idle moment to see how it turns out. Maybe 
they're more interested in star formation, or bacteria or something. Is an E. 
in your gut justified in thinking God made the universe, including human guts, 
just for its benefit?

Stathis Papaioannou
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to