Nick (and List):
just a short remark to the very first words of your post below (mostly
erased):
>
> If we are living in a simulation .....<
I think this is the usual pretension (not only on this list).
I think "we simulate what we are living in" according to the little we know.
Such 'simulation' - 'simplification' - 'modeling' - 'metaphorizing' - or
weven
'harrypotterizing' things we think does not change the "unknown/unknowable"
we live in. We just think "and therefore we think we are.

Most ignorantly and commonsensically yours

John M


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:05 PM
Subject: RE: The moral dimension of simulation


> If we are living in a simulation (and I believe the matrix hypothesis is a
> real possibility) and if we are all just software constructs then the
> architect has some options available to it.
SNIP


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to