Brent Meeker wrote:

> As my physics prof, Jurgen Ehlers used to say, "Before we can say whether or
> not a thing exists we must know some of it's properities."  So to know
> whether or not bigfoot exists we need to know enough properties of the
> concept 'bigfoot', like "big", "hairy", "bipedal", "lives in woods of the
> Pacific Northwest",...  Given enough properties we may be able to test his
> existence against empirical evidence and reach a provisional conclusion.
> So epistemology precedes ontology.

OTOH, ontology precedes epistemology, because you
can't figure out whether anything else exists unless you exist!

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to