Bruno Marchal wrote: > Le 18-août-06, à 17:02, 1Z a écrit : > > > It is for Pythagorenas and Platonists to explain what they mean by > > "exist". > > > > However, if you are going to claim that we are actually *in* Platonia, > > (mathematical monism) there must be some equivalence between the > > existence we > > have and the existence numbers have. > > > > Of course! But that is what I am currently explaining. If you have > follow the UDA, then, even if you could not yet be completely convinced > by each steps, you should at least be able to figure out in which sense > "you", here and now, in the "shape" of an OM, to borrow the list > vocabulary, exist as a relative number.
I cna't be persuaded of that without first being persuaded that numbers exist. > Third personally you exist in > aleph-zero relative number form (like snapshots of a running program). > First personally you exist in the same shape (although you cannot know > that) but you are "multiplied" by a continuum: the computational > histories generated by the UD, in the mathematical sense, going through > those third person states. > > Bruno > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
