Le 22-août-06, à 05:32, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> That sentence summarises the problem pretty well. We have to agree > that there is this dichotomy before proceeding further, and I don't > think most computationalists do. I guess my work is not so well known and I guess I have some responsibility in this. You must realize, for example, that comp is the favorite explicit or implicit hypothesis of the weak materialist (which believes that primary matter exists, or that matter exists primitively). I can understand they does not like the idea that comp and weak materialism are (epistemologically) incompatible. Atheist are mad at it. I have underestimate the influence of aristotelism on the (weak or not) materialists. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
