> Stathis:
> would you condone to include in your (appreciated) post below the words at
> the * I plant into your text?
> The words: "in the (scientific?) belief system we have TODAY about our
> interpretation of whatever epistemically we so far learned about the
> 'world'."
> That would underline your subsequent sentence - if you kindly stop
> denigrating the term 'metaphysics' - a pejoration of the same 'carried away'
> physicists.
> The word 'prediction' also sends the chill alongside my spine: how can a
> model based on a model predict events subject to impact from 'beyond model'
> changes?

If you know the domain of your model there won't be any impact from beyond.  Of 
course the domain is uncertain at the edges - but just because there is grey 
mean there is no black and white.

> The many results of science-technology should not lead us into a generalized
> acceptance of the model-based thinking. 

Should we then resort mystical thinking or armchair philosophizing or 

>This list is a good example.

Can you do some other kind of thinking?

Brent Meeker

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to