Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

> Peter Jone swrites:
>
> > > What I meant was, if a computer program can be associated with
> > > consciousness, then a rigid and deterministic computer program can also
> > > be associated with consciousness -
> >
> >
> > That doesn't follow. Comutationalists don't
> > have to believe any old programme is conscious.
> > It might be the case that only an indeterministic
> > one will do. A deterministic programme could
> > be exposed as a programme in a Turing Test.
>
> Then you're saying something strange and non-physical happens to explain
> why a program is conscious on the first run when it passes the Turing test
> but not on the second run when it deterministically repeats all the physical 
> states
> of the first run in response to a recording of your keystrokes from the first 
> run.

It was never conscious, and if anyonw concludede it was on
the first run, they were mistaken. The TT is a rule-of-thumb for
detecting,
it does not magically endow consciousness.

> Stathis Papaioannou
> _________________________________________________________________
> Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
> http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to