Quentin Anciaux wrote: > Le Tuesday 29 Août 2006 20:23, 1Z a écrit : > > Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > Le Tuesday 29 Août 2006 17:32, 1Z a écrit : > > > > t be of a large measure... till there is one ! > > > > > > We are all individuals, and as such have the same measure.. > > > > > > What do you mean by that ? measure is about an OM. > > > > OM's are even more individual than observers. > > So what ? Do you mean every OM has the same measure ?
I don't have, or need, a theory of measure. All I am saying is that you cannot claim that The Poor Person has a higher measure than The Rich Person, since inidividuals are individuated by many other factors. > in an absolute sense ? > (in which case I would agree partially though complexity measure should play > a role here) or in a relative sense ? (here I would disagree) > > Quentin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
