|
George Levy: The scientist could prove that he is not alone by
invoking the principle of sufficient reason: nothing is arbitrary and exist
with no reason. If something exists in a particular arbitrary way (himself)
with no reason for him to be in that particular way, then all other
alternatives of him must also exist (the Plenitude). Hence he is not
alone. Solipsism is dead. I agree! The point is they don’t!
(prove they are not alone). What they do is act ‘as-if’
they are not alone and deny ‘mind’ as evidence of anything by
OMISSION. If mind admitted as evidence in its own right they would be doing
science on something causal of mind, rather than on the appearances it
delivers. They do not do this…so…. If you had read the whole thing you would
find that despite your logic (with which I agree!), scientists are unwitting ‘as-if’
solipsists. So the reality is that it is not actually (methodologically) dead
because scientific behaviour is ‘as-if’ it were a policy in science.
That is the whole point! Don’t tell me!. Tell scientists
other than me! Ask them why they continue to be virtual solipsists. Or better: ask
them If ‘that which is seen’ is scientific evidence, then what is ‘seeing’
evidence of? It’s not evidence for brain’s appearance, it’s
evidence of something manipulated by brains to generate appearance. Why don’t
we work on that? They do not…..neural correlates of consciousness is NOT
doing that…ergo scientists are all methodological solipsists tacit in-denial
because none of them realise it….because they are not doing something
they don’t know they are not doing. Please read the whole thing. Colin Hales --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- RE: computationalism and supervenience Colin Geoffrey Hales
- RE: computationalism and supervenience Stathis Papaioannou
- Re: computationalism and supervenience Bruno Marchal
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature of the Turing ... Colin Geoffrey Hales
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature of the Tur... Bruno Marchal
- RE: Reality, the bogus nature of the... Colin Hales
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Russell Standish
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... jamikes
- RE: Solipsism unplugged Colin Hales
- Re: Solipsism unplugged George Levy
- RE: Solipsism unplugged Colin Hales
- Re: Solipsism unplugged 1Z
- Re: Solipsism unplugged 1Z
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... 1Z
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Colin Geoffrey Hales
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Brent Meeker
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... David Nyman
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Russell Standish
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Bruno Marchal
- Re: Reality, the bogus nature o... Russell Standish

