> Le 10-nov.-06, ࠰5:53, Colin Geoffrey Hales a 飲it :
>> The brackets I have used to date are not the brackets of the lambda
>> calculus. I think physically, not symbolically. I find the jargon
>> really
>> hard to relate to.
> I thought you were referring to Alonzo Church's original book on
> "lambda conversion".
> Why do you want use the lambda calculus if you don't want use its
> "jargon"?

It's OK bruno!
I only meant I struggle, not that I was not going to use it! I would be
silly not to use a well established formalism, as you say.

I have so many computer languages wasting space in my poor brain I have
trouble squeezing yet another syntax in there and getting it to flow



 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to