On 2/21/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A human with an intact brain behaving like an awake human could not
> > really be a zombie unless you believe in magic. However, it is possible
> > to conceive of intelligently-behaving beings who do not have an internal
> > life because they lack the right sort of brains. I am not suggesting
> > that this is the case and there are reasons to think it is unlikely to
> > be the case, but it is not ruled out by any empirical observation.
> > Stathis Papaioannou
> The problem is that there doesn't seem to be any conceivable observation
> that could rule it out. So by Popper's rule it is a not a scientific
> proposition but rather a metaphysical one. This is another way of saying
> that there is no agreed upon way of assigning a truth or probability value
> to it.
> Brent Meeker
This is the usual accusation, but in one sense first person experience is
perfectly easily verified - by the first person. This is a problem for
science because we want our experiments to be third person repeatable and
verifiable, otherwise anyone could make up anything, but arguably this is a
practical rather than philosophical requirement.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at