So are sets of cardinality \aleph_2 or sets of cardinality

On the other hand, one set of cardinality 2^\aleph_0 appears to be big
enough to explain all of observed reality.

Maybe Tegmarkism is going too far...

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:19:03AM +0330, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
> *All actual measurements yield rational values.  Using real numbers in the
> equations of physics is probably merely a convenience (since calculus is
> easier than finite differences).  There is no evidence that defining an
> instantaneous state requires uncountable information.*
> What about the realizability of mathematical concepts. Real numbers are
> mathematical, so they should have a counterpart in real world. What ever
> that counterpart is, it's toils the problem of uncountability.
> But I think your answer is the best shot.
> Mohsen Ravanbakhsh.
> > 


A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to