On 14 Apr, 17:34, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are right. UDA only shows that matter, whatever conception we can
> have about it as far as it is primary, is void of any explanation power
> given that we HAVE TO justify material appearances from the number
> relation (by comp, through uda).
>
> You are right, but why don't you tell to the biologist that they have
> not refuted vitalism? It is correct but I am not sure it is
> interesting, indeed, by occam razor, which you do always when you
> choose and apply a theory to something.
Vitalism is probably false, it is not impossible. It has been refuted
scientifically, because science deals in probabilities.
The same is not true of everythingism, because everythingism is
philosophy and require an assumption of Platonism.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
