Steven Smithee is not just a Black Belt Bayesian, but a Black Belt at
Keeping Track of Who Has Said What About Cool Topics in Web Pages that
are Linked To from Nowhere Else on the Internet. He pointed out
<>, where someone (Hal Finney, if we go
by 'whois') said:

> A final point: I strongly suspect that the biggest contribution to the 
> measure of observers (and observer-moments) like our own will arise from 
> programs which conceptually have two parts. The first part creates a universe 
> similar to the one we see where the observers evolve, and the second part 
> selects the observer for output. I have argued elsewhere that each part can 
> be relatively small compared to a program which was hard-wired to produce a 
> specific observer and had all the information necessary to do so. Small 
> programs have greater measure (occupy a greater fraction of possible input 
> strings) hence this would be the main source of measure for observers like us.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to