Le Thursday 29 November 2007 19:28:05 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
> Quentin Anciaux skrev:
> > Le Thursday 29 November 2007 18:52:36 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
> >> Quentin Anciaux skrev:
> >>> What is the production rules of the "no"set R ?
> >>
> >> How do you define "the set R"?
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_real_numbers
> >
> > Choose your method...
> The most important part of that definition is:
> 4. The order ? is /complete/ in the following sense: every non-empty
> subset of *R* bounded above <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_bound>
> has a least upper bound <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_upper_bound>.
> This definition can be translated to:
> "If you have a production rule that produces rational numbers that are
> bounded above, then this production rule is producing a real number."
> This is the production rule for real numbers.

And how this render the *set R* ]-infinity,infinity[ finite/limited or even 
the set N [0,infinity[ ?

If as you say you have elements/events/... after the last element/event/... it 
is totally contradictory and meaning less to call it last... If I take it as 
a demonstration by absurd, then you've just demonstrated that there exists no 
last element/event/... How can you avoid this contradiction ?

Quentin Anciaux

All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to