> The focus of my paper is on theories in principle fully describing universes > (or u-reality). The term 'logically possible' is intended to contrast with > 'physically possible' and refers to descriptions (theories) being internally > non-contradictory (more in note 4 in my paper).
OK >Classical logic is usually > intended in these kinds of cases, and I can't actually see from what I know > of other logics how they might relevantly extend the range of possible > inhabitable universes beyond those describable by formal systems operating > according to classical logic. (There is also the issue of their additional Brent already mentioned paraconsistent logics, here a nice link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_world (the article links to an article by Zalta, the one who is responsible for this http://plato.stanford.edu/ wonderful resource. Cheers, Günther --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
