On Sep 12, 5:06 am, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > <b>Given two categories C and D a functor F from C to D can be thought
> > of as an *analogy* between C and D, because F has to map objects of C
> > to objects of D and arrows of C to arrows of D in such a way that the
> > compositional structure of the two categories is preserved.</b>
>
> No meaning there either.
>
> Brent
>
Given that its been published on wikipedia, I'd say ya need to brush
up on ya category theory. Analogies and category theory are very
interesting indeed, as a possible means to extend Bayesianism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_theory
Cheers.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
