Anna, OK, I understand.

Thomas, as another reference point for study, what I refer to as the
point of view from the Plenitude, or Plotinus' One, has frequently
been referred to as the "God's eye point of view".
(I didn't bring that up at first because I believe in a God who is
different from the Plenitude or Plotinus' One, both of which are
impersonal.  By the way, the personal God is the only one in whom a
person can possibly believe, but that could be another topic.)


On Nov 7, 10:31 am, "A. Wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Tom Caylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anna's explanation was from the frequentist side.
> > Gunther's was from the Bayesian side.
> I actually agree with the Bayesian point of view, but I was trying to
> avoid injecting expectation into a description of how infinite domains
> can have probability distributions in a "conceptual" sense.
> Anna
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to