> theoretical computer science and mathematical logic. Rereading
> "Conscience et Mécanisme" I realize Russell Standish was right, and that
> book should be translated in english because it contains an almost
> complete (self-contained) explanation of logic (for the physicists),
> including the historical foundations which are genuine, and a detailed
> explanation of the measurement problem in quantum physics, for the
> logicians. (beyong the most detailed account of the UD). It renders also
> justice to all the contributors in the debate on Gödel (like Benacerraf,
> Reinhardt, Webb, Wang, and many others). There are many
> misunderstandings, which reminds me the book by Torkel Franzen ...
I would certainly like to read the book - I managed a bit the Lille
thesis (with my French), but it was hard going and I think I only
understood the stuff because we have had many discussions here on the
list - so it was easy to "translate". I am not so sure I can manage the
huge Bruxelles work, but I will try someday when I have more time :-))
Maybe you can find a publisher who is prepared to translate the book
> Also, it is hard to *believe* in the plausibility of the conclusion of
> UDA without having a good understanding of Everett's Quantum Mechanics.
> What could be a "good" introduction to Everett? ... Deutch' FOR book,
> but also Albert's one, D'Espagnat, .....
Of course, yes - I will include Albert and Deutsch on the references
page concerning the UDA. Albert especially is good in his account of
weird quantum experiments.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at