Bruno, > theoretical computer science and mathematical logic. Rereading > "Conscience et Mécanisme" I realize Russell Standish was right, and that > book should be translated in english because it contains an almost > complete (self-contained) explanation of logic (for the physicists), > including the historical foundations which are genuine, and a detailed > explanation of the measurement problem in quantum physics, for the > logicians. (beyong the most detailed account of the UD). It renders also > justice to all the contributors in the debate on Gödel (like Benacerraf, > Reinhardt, Webb, Wang, and many others). There are many > misunderstandings, which reminds me the book by Torkel Franzen ...
I would certainly like to read the book - I managed a bit the Lille thesis (with my French), but it was hard going and I think I only understood the stuff because we have had many discussions here on the list - so it was easy to "translate". I am not so sure I can manage the huge Bruxelles work, but I will try someday when I have more time :-)) Maybe you can find a publisher who is prepared to translate the book into english? > Also, it is hard to *believe* in the plausibility of the conclusion of > UDA without having a good understanding of Everett's Quantum Mechanics. > What could be a "good" introduction to Everett? ... Deutch' FOR book, > but also Albert's one, D'Espagnat, ..... Of course, yes - I will include Albert and Deutsch on the references page concerning the UDA. Albert especially is good in his account of weird quantum experiments. Cheers, Günther --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
