> To active participants in the process, it would never seem that intelligence
> ran away, however to outsiders who shun technology, or refuse to augment
> themselves, I think it would appear to run away.  Consider at some point,
> the technology becomes available to upload one's mind into a computer, half
> the population accepts this and does so, while the other half reject it.  On
> this new substrate, human minds could run at one million times the rate of
> biological brains, and in one year's time, the uploaded humans would have
> experienced a million years worth of experience, invention, progress, etc.
> It would be hard to imagine what the uploaded humans would even have in
> common or be able to talk about after even a single day's time (2,700 years
> to those who uploaded).  In this sense, intelligence has run away, from the
> perspective of the biological humans.

Hi! I agree with everything you say. I hadn't until now understood
what is meant by TS. I thought that Kurzweil referred to IE as
"runaway", but now I see that what is meant is simply a large
acceleration in the pace at which events happen. That I can well
believe to be possible. And I guess that before I can talk about an
exponential increase in intelligence, I'd really need to define how
it's measured.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to