On Nov 28, 9:02 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi <use...@rudnyi.ru> wrote: > on 28.11.2010 20:46 1Z said the following: > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 7:21 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi<use...@rudnyi.ru> wrote: > >> on 27.11.2010 20:08 1Z said the following: > > >>> On Nov 27, 6:49 pm, Rex Allen<rexallen31...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> Given that there are an infinite number of ways that your > >>>> information could be represented, how likely is it that your > >>>> experience really is caused by a biological brain? Or even by > >>>> a representation of a biological brain? > > >>> Occam's razor: BIV, matrix and other sceptical scenarios are > >>> always more complex, and therefore less likely than "things are > >>> the way they seem to be" > > >> Could you please tell what a hypothesis you consider as less > >> complex? > > > I did. > > >> As for Occam's razor. Let us consider the statement "The God has > >> created everything". Is this more or less complex as compared with > >> the modern scientific view? > > > Is "God+World" more or less simple than "World" ? > > I guess that people believing in God consider him as a part of the > world.
That is definitely not Judaeo-Christian philosophy. > Hence here it would be better to compare > > "World where people believe in God" > > with > > "World where people believe that God does not exist" Those aren't ontologies -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
