On Nov 29, 4:15 am, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, my view is that there is no thinker, only thought.
> Once you accept that the conscious experience of a rock exists, what
> purpose does the actual rock serve?
It makes the thought "there is a rock here" either true or false.
> Also, you’ve introduced a new question: How does unconscious matter
> governed by unconscious physical laws give rise to conscious
You scheme raises the question: why are our thoughts apparently
meaningful and true, and why do we care about that, when,
they are actually neither.
> Why not just accept accidental idealism?
Because "there are no absolute causes/explanaions" is a bad reason to
give up on causation
and explanation completely
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at