On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 8:15 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Things might be that way.  But this requires an explanation of the
> existence of the information and the interpreter.  And then an
> explanation of the explanation.  And then an explanation of the
> explanation of the explanation.  And so on.
> Down the rabbit hole of infinite regress.  Doesn’t seem promising, and
> doesn’t seem necessary.
> Why not just accept accidental idealism?
> Rex
>
>
> Maybe I would if you could explain it.

Which part do you not understand?

Rex

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to