On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/28/2010 8:15 PM, Rex Allen wrote: > > ... > > Things might be that way. But this requires an explanation of the > existence of the information and the interpreter. And then an > explanation of the explanation. And then an explanation of the > explanation of the explanation. And so on. > Down the rabbit hole of infinite regress. Doesn’t seem promising, and > doesn’t seem necessary. > Why not just accept accidental idealism? > Rex > > > Maybe I would if you could explain it.
Which part do you not understand? Rex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
