On 12/6/2010 8:54 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Bruno Marchal<marc...@ulb.ac.be>  wrote:
>  On 29 Nov 2010, at 05:15, Rex Allen wrote:
>>  On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Jason Resch<jasonre...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>    Would
>>>  you admit then, that a computer which interprets bits the same way as a
>>>  brain could be conscious?  Isn't this mechanism?  Or is your view more
>>>  like
>>>  the Buddhist idea that there is no thinker, only thought?
>>  Right, my view is that there is no thinker, only thought.
>  Ah! The key point where we differ the most. Person is the key concept for
>  those who grasp mechanism and its consequences.
>  At least you don't eliminate consciousness, but you do eliminate persons.
>  Brr...


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to