On 12/6/2010 8:54 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Bruno Marchal<marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2010, at 05:15, Rex Allen wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Jason Resch<jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> you admit then, that a computer which interprets bits the same way as a
>>> brain could be conscious? Isn't this mechanism? Or is your view more
>>> the Buddhist idea that there is no thinker, only thought?
>> Right, my view is that there is no thinker, only thought.
> Ah! The key point where we differ the most. Person is the key concept for
> those who grasp mechanism and its consequences.
> At least you don't eliminate consciousness, but you do eliminate persons.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at