On Jul 23, 6:17 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 23, 11:40 am, 1Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jul 23, 2:35 am, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Think of them like sock puppet/bots multiplying in a closed social > > > network. If you have 100 actual friends on a social network and their > > > accounts are progressively replaced by emulated accounts posting even > > > slightly unconvincing status updates, > > > Why would "slightly unconvincing" fall under "exact funcitonal > > replacement"? > > Because it's not possible for the emulation to simulate first person > participation forever from a third person design.
Says who? > First person > participants don't even know what they are going to say or do in a > given situation. Maybe a brain scan would tell them. The *conscious* self is only a small art. >The sense of what the thing is leaks through sooner > or later. > > > IOW: yout think the Neurone Replacement Hypothesis doens't > > disprove your theory because you think your theory is correct. > > See the problem? > > If my theory is correct, the Neuron Replacement Hypothesis is a Red > Herring. And vice versa. > It's not a problem, it's a solution. > > > There is such a thing as machine learning. > > Definitely. Inorganic mega-molecules can do amazing things. Enjoying a > steak dinner isn't one of them though. What have qualia to do with learning? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
