On Aug 20, 9:36 pm, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Craig,
> you know more about the 'IBM-Synapse' achievement than myself (easy: I know
> nothing, did not even thopughtfully decipher the article in all its
> details).
> I would ask IBM (they may not reply of course) if their machine (chip?) can
> solve ANY technical problem barred by unsurmountable difficulties to a - not
> only reasonable - but to a BETTER result than expected?

Yes, I think that's the key. We want to make an intelligence which can
supersede our own yet forever remain our pet/toy/slave. It's a straw
man of intelligence. Intelligence has the capacity to step out of it's
own system - to express genius in the face of known impossibilities.

> An examp[le from my past (and this is not boasting, it is an example how
> human creativity could win over the "power of poverty".
> In Commi Hungary the pharmceutical researchers wnted ion exchange resins for
> a process to extract streptomycin from its broth. They did not have the
> foreign currency to buy it, so they came to me (project Ion Exchange in the
> polymer Research Inst.) to make such for them. I needed the cross-linking
> agent (di-vinyl-benzene) to make the polymer and, of course I did not get
> the foreign currency for it either. So I went to the Organic Chem. pilot
> plant for styrene (Mono-vinyl-benzene) if they have some side-product I
> could use. They had a distillation residue, a dark goo and stated that it
> contains 15-25% of the stuff. Iff...
> I had no facilities to extract it, so I decided the peasant-way: put the
> entire goo into my mixture tp be polymerized and hoped that after cleaning
> out all dirt from the resulting (cross-linked) polymer it will show
> usability. After lots of cleaning I got seemingly OK bead-polymeers, which
> after further treatment went into strepto-testing. That's when the Heureka
> broke out: my dirty product bound several times more of the antibiotic than
> the World Market products. The rest was routine: reproductions, changing
> parameters and applying for the patents.

That's awesome, and that to me is what Real Science is. A human
identity fully engaged in breaking through to improved significance on
multiple human and human interpreted levels.

>Does the machine-brain go after
> such series of hurdles and evaluate what can be done? Does it stay within
> the limits and reduce the events to their applicability?
> This was one example without rules and systems, no calculations, only
> circumventing the obstacles untold.
> John M

Congratulations, that's a great true story.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to