On Sep 13, 9:38 pm, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 9/13/2011 4:07 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >> The rules are at bottom the laws of physics.
> > That doesn't mean anything. The laws of physics are the rules. That's
> > why I say it's circular reasoning. I ask you what is a rule, and you
> > say it's at the bottom of laws, but laws are just another word for
> > rule. There is no bottom, because there's nothing there. It's an
> > intellectual construct.
> Of course it's an intellectual construct, but it has predictive power.

I agree. Deferent and epicycle have predictive power too. It doesn't
mean they can't be understood in a greater context with more
explanatory if not predictive power.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to