On Nov 15, 12:11 am, Russell Standish <li...@hpcoders.com.au> wrote: > In principle, yes. What you are talking about is "quantum erasure". It > should even be possible to do it without forgetting the current > worldline (in which case one is really finding a consistent > continuation of the current worldline that happens to be very similar to > the destination worldline). This would be rather similar to > teleportation type scenarios where instead of just teleporting through > space, one teleports through time. How this might be arranged > practically seems even more removed than than the space case, but > theoretically it should be similar. > > I'm not at all sure how you might refute QTI using this, but please elaborate. > > Cheers > > Hi Russell
Is teleportation through (space)time not just the same as Bruno's UDA argument where a delay in the reconstitution takes place? If we were to be sure that the universe was just a level 1 type but was infinite in space and time, would you not think that a consistent continuation through time for any of our observer moments would be necessary since eventually some worldine which could act as such a consistent continuation will occur. This seems to support QTI not refute it. Kind regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
