2012/2/3 Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> > On Feb 3, 8:01 am, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote: > . > > > > No that's not what comp predict. Comp predict that what you see is what > you > > see. > > Oh, comp predicts direct perception and not indirect representational > quaia? Do tell. > > > > Comp is the computation theory of mind. If you start assuming stupid > > thing you can only conclude stupid thing, but your conclusion has nothing > > to do with comp. > > Do you say the same of Dennett's many examples of optical illusions? > Why does he use those if his view of the universe (comp), says that > 'what you see is what you see.'? >
Because comp is the theory saying that *you are turing emulable* If you current vision was not turing emulable, it's a fail from the starting point... If you can't see that you're more stupid than I thought. You could always posit that vision was not turing emulable... but without any proof, like John Clark says, it's gaz... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > > -- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
