On 2/13/2012 10:39 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:29 pm, meekerdb<meeke...@verizon.net>  wrote:

I'm aware of that.  It doesn't follow though that you must match every 
interaction (e.g.
cross-section for cosmic gamma rays) or that every match is equally important.  
already speculated that a silicon based substitute might produce subtle or 
differences in conscious thoughts.  Craig however denies that a silicon based 
brain can be
conscious at all.
No, I think that silicon is already 'conscious', only to a very
limited extent (detection-reaction). My view is that it cannot be
scaled up mechanically to become human consciousness. If you can make
a silicon based cell that lives and breathes,

What does "live and breathes" mean? A silicon based neuron wouldn't reproduce...but neither do biological neurons. A biological neuron metabolizes...but so would a silicon based neuron. So you're just speculating that there are some essential functions of biological based neurons that can't be realized by silicon based neurons.

then we very well might
be able to make a conscious brain out of that...but we probably won't
be able to control it any better than we can control an animal.

Our definition of consciousness is entirely human. If we talk about
something being conscious, we are really talking about it being human.

That's begging the question.

All I'm saying is that we cannot discount the possibility that there
is a good reason why humans are only made of DNA and not sand.

You've been asserting that it's the case...not just cautioning about possibilities. So let's hear one of those 'good reasons'; one that is not just a speculative possibility.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to