On 2/24/2012 3:05 PM, John Mikes wrote:
People have too much time on their hand to argue back and forth.
Whatever (theory) we talk about has been born from human mind(s)
consequently only HALF _ TRUE max (if at all).
Almost all our theories are not only probably false, they are *known* to be false. But
that doesn't mean they should be discarded or they are not useful. It means they have
limited accuracy and limited domains of validity.
"I" imagine te doctor, "I" imagine the numbers (there are none in Nature)
"I" imagine controversies and matches, arithemtics, calculus and bio.
Project the "I"-s into 3rd person "I"-s and FEEL justified to BELIEVE
that it is *_T R U E ._*
"True" means different things in different theories. In ordinary, declarative speech it
means correspondence with a fact. In science it's the goal of predictive accuracy over
the whole range of applications and consilience with other all other 'true' theories. In
logic it's an attribute "t" of propositions that are axioms and that's preserved by the
rules of inference.
How 'universal' is a universal machine (number)? it extends its universality
till our imagination's end. Can we imagine what we cannot imagine?
We have to build on what we have.
You have to make the good out of the bad because that is all you have
got to make it out of.
--- Robert Penn Warren
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at