On Feb 24, 11:13 pm, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Of course. They are the particular sense of epistemology which 'seems
> like' the opposite of 'seems like'. Phenomena are reduced to their
> wireframe invariance - a skeleton which seems as if it 'simply is'
> because it represents the most common overlap and discards all nuanced
> underlap.

Didn;t understand that.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to