On Feb 24, 11:13 pm, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course. They are the particular sense of epistemology which 'seems > like' the opposite of 'seems like'. Phenomena are reduced to their > wireframe invariance - a skeleton which seems as if it 'simply is' > because it represents the most common overlap and discards all nuanced > underlap. Didn;t understand that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
