On 08 Aug 2012, at 20:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/8/2012 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Aug 2012, at 17:24, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
No, I find that normal. Atheism needs a precise notion of God to
make, but all serious theologian and mystics tend to think that
God, like truth or consciousness does not admit a simple
definition, making atheism a very vague position, unless it means
only I don't believe in the literalist abramanic definition of God.
In which case 99% of the mundial population is atheist, and that
makes the notion quite trivial.
> I don't believe in any literal definition, of God, universe,
If that's what you believe, or rather what you don't believe, then
why are you unable to utter the simple crystal clear declarative
sentence "I am a atheist" ? Why all the gobbledegook?
Because I am not an atheist. I am fascinated by most discourses by
many theologians and mystics belonging to a wide variety of
traditions. I have studied classical chinese to be sure I did not
misinterpret the taoists, which have been my favorite for a long
time. I have read Plato and Plotinus. I am a neoplatonist
believer, if you want, and as far as I can conceive that comp is
correct, I am a Pythagorean.
But you're not a theist
Theism, in the broadest sense, is the belief that at least one deity
So I am a theist.
In a more specific sense, theism is a doctrine concerning the nature
of a monotheistic God and God's relationship to the universe. 
So I am even more a theist, as I am monist (assuming comp, etc.).
Theism, in this specific sense, conceives of God as personal,
present and active in the governance and organization of the world
and the universe. As such theism describes the classical conception
of God that is found in Christianity, Judaism, Islam and some forms
I am probably much more taoist and buddhist, and sufi and cabbalist,
and close to the Christian mystics.
The others, like a part of the scientists today, bear too much on
argument from authority and politics. They have willingly discourage
the scientific attitude. You can find youtube video showing how
mystics are still demonized by the Islamic and Christians mainstream.
In fact it is like health politics, people prefer argument from
authority in place of argument from observation and reflexion.
The use of the word theism to indicate this classical form of
monotheism began during the scientific revolution of the seventeenth
century in order to distinguish it from the then-emerging deism
which contended that God, though transcendent and supreme, did not
intervene in the natural world and could be known rationally but not
Which confirms what I just said.
- hence John's question.
Hence my conclusion. Atheists defend the conception of God coming from
the political. Not from spiritual inquiry and scientific research,
which is traditionally demonized by those who use God as an argument
Your quote made my point even clearer.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at