On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:38:27PM -0400, John Clark wrote: > > There is another problem, to define "free will" you have to introduce the > concept of awareness and to define awareness you have to introduce "free > will"; and regardless of what a being may or may not be aware of, that is > to say regardless of what information it does or does not have in its > memory, it does things for a reason or it does not, so you're still either > a cuckoo clock or a roulette wheel.
Why does the concept of awareness depend on free will? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
