On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:38:27PM -0400, John Clark wrote:
> There is another problem, to define "free will" you have to introduce the
> concept of awareness and to define awareness you have to introduce "free
> will"; and regardless of what a being may or may not be aware of, that is
> to say regardless of what information it does or does not have in its
> memory, it does things for a reason or it does not, so you're still either
> a cuckoo clock or a roulette wheel.

Why does the concept of awareness depend on free will?


Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to