Hi Roger,

Indeed! This corresponds to non-distributive logical lattices.But we
still need more details. The best attempt that i have seen on deriving
extension was Roger Penrose' spin network idea.

On 8/23/2012 8:04 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Stephen P. King
> Some entities (like my mouse) are extended in space, others (like what
> I am thinking) are not.
> It isn't either/or, it''s both/and.
> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>
> 8/23/2012
> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
> everything could function."
>
>     ----- Receiving the following content -----
>     *From:* Stephen P. King <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>
>     *Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>     *Time:* 2012-08-22, 11:23:08
>     *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy
>     with achanceofthunderstorms
>
>     Dear Roger,
>
>     A lot of people have a very hard time comprehending abstract
>     ideas, they are stuck thinking of them as physical things. A small
>     minority of people are stuck thinking of concepts as purely
>     mental. It is necessary to consider both of these points of view
>     and be able to understand the difference between them. The best
>     analogy of the relation between them is the inside and outside
>     views of a volume filled with hollow spheres.Waht happens if the
>     spheres are actually Klein Bottles?
>
>     On 8/22/2012 9:17 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
>>     Hi Richard Ruquist
>>     I'm getting tired of trying to explain this to you. You have to
>>     do more thinking.
>>     Monads have no extension. And they have no location nor time. So
>>     they are merely
>>     theoretical, extensionless, outside of spacetime. You have to
>>     have extension to
>>     physically exist.
>>     Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>
>>     8/22/2012
>>     Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
>>     everything could function."
>>
>>         ----- Receiving the following content -----
>>         *From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:yann...@gmail.com>
>>         *Receiver:* everything-list
>>         <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>>         *Time:* 2012-08-22, 09:09:31
>>         *Subject:* Re: Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be
>>         cloudy with a chanceofthunderstorms
>>
>>         Roger,
>>
>>         Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc.
>>         These are the building blocks of space in
>>         integration-information theory.
>>         Richard
>>
>>         On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough
>>         <rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Richard Ruquist
>>              
>>             You need to study the monadology. And the history of
>>             modern physics.
>>              
>>             Space does not physically exist for L (as for us) because
>>             it is empty, as the Milligan-whatshisname
>>             experiment proved a century ago. The notion of an ether
>>             is a fantasy. It doesn't exist.
>>             Photons just go from A to B through a quantum or
>>             mathematical wavefield, not an actual one.
>>              
>>              
>>             Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
>>             <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>
>>             8/22/2012
>>             Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to
>>             invent him so everything could function."
>>
>>                 ----- Receiving the following content -----
>>                 *From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:yann...@gmail.com>
>>                 *Receiver:* everything-list
>>                 <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>>                 *Time:* 2012-08-22, 07:06:07
>>                 *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will
>>                 be cloudy with a chance ofthunderstorms
>>
>>                 Roger, " monads are by definition nonlocal " does not
>>                 mean that " space does not exist". Your logic is faulty.
>>                 Richard
>>
>>
>>                 On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough
>>                 <rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Hi benjayk
>>                     In monadic theory,�since space does not exist,
>>                     monads are by definition nonlocal, thus all minds
>>                     in a sense are one
>>                     and can commune with one another as well as with
>>                     God (the mind behind the supreme monad).
>>                     The clarity of intercommunication will of course
>>                     depend, of course, on the sensitivity of the
>>                     monads, their intelligence,
>>                     and how "near" (resonant) their partners are, as
>>                     well as other factors�such as whether or not its
>>                     a clear�monadic weather day.
>>                     Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
>>                     <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>
>>                     8/22/2012
>>                     Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have
>>                     to invent him so everything could function."
>>
>>                         ----- Receiving the following content -----
>>                         *From:* benjayk
>>                         <mailto:benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com>
>>                         *Receiver:* everything-list
>>                         <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>>                         *Time:* 2012-08-21, 17:24:01
>>                         *Subject:* Re: Simple proof that our
>>                         intelligence transcends that of computers
>>
>>                         meekerdb wrote:
>>                         >
>>                         > "This sentence cannot be confirmed to be
>>                         true by a human being."
>>                         >
>>                         > The Computer
>>                         >
>>
>>                         He might be right in saying that (See my
>>                         response to Saibal).
>>                         But it can't confirm it as well (how could
>>                         it, since we as humans can't
>>                         confirm it and what he knows about us derives
>>                         from what we program into
>>                         it?). So still, it is less capable than a human.
>>                         -- 
>>                         V
>>
>


-- 
Onward!

Stephen

"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." 
~ Francis Bacon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to