Dear Roger,
You are being inconsistent to the very definition of a monad. They
do not have an "outside" that could ever been seen from a point of view
and thus to think of them as if they do, such as the concept of a space
full of them (which implies mutual displacement) if to think of them as
atoms that are exclusively "outside view" defined. Within the Monadology
all concepts that imply an "outside view" are strictly defined in terms
of appearances from the inside.
On 8/22/2012 9:09 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Roger,
Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc.
These are the building blocks of space in integration-information theory.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
You need to study the monadology. And the history of modern physics.
Space does not physically exist for L (as for us) because it is
empty, as the Milligan-whatshisname
experiment proved a century ago. The notion of an ether is a
fantasy. It doesn't exist.
Photons just go from A to B through a quantum or mathematical
wavefield, not an actual one.
Roger Clough, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
8/22/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
*From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:[email protected]>
*Receiver:* everything-list
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Time:* 2012-08-22, 07:06:07
*Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy
with a chance ofthunderstorms
Roger, " monads are by definition nonlocal�" does not mean
that " space does not exist". Your logic is faulty.
Richard�
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi benjayk
�
In monadic theory,爏ince space does not exist, monads are
by definition nonlocal, thus all minds in a sense are one
and can commune with one another as well as with God (the
mind behind the supreme monad).
�
The clarity of intercommunication will of course depend,
of course, on the sensitivity of the monads, their
intelligence,
and how "near" (resonant) their partners are, as well as
other factors爏uch as whether or not its
a clear爉onadic weather day.
�
�
Roger Clough, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
8/22/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent
him so everything could function."
----- Receiving the following content -----
*From:* benjayk <mailto:[email protected]>
*Receiver:* everything-list
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 17:24:01
*Subject:* Re: Simple proof that our intelligence
transcends that of computers
meekerdb wrote:
>
> "This sentence cannot be confirmed to be true by a
human being."
>
> The Computer
>
He might be right in saying that (See my response to
Saibal).
But it can't confirm it as well (how could it, since
we as humans can't
confirm it and what he knows about us derives from
what we program into
it?). So still, it is less capable than a human.
--
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
