On Thursday, January 3, 2013 9:04:39 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>
>  Hi Craig Weinberg 
>  
> Evil is not defined by law, but crime is.
>

 I ask again, "Did I contradict that somewhere?"

 
>  
> [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net] <javascript:>
> 1/3/2013 
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
>
> ----- Receiving the following content ----- 
> *From:* Craig Weinberg <javascript:> 
> *Receiver:* everything-list <javascript:> 
> *Time:* 2013-01-03, 08:12:58
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil
>
>  
>
> On Thursday, January 3, 2013 5:35:00 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: 
>>
>>  Hi Craig Weinberg 
>>  
>> Do you know anything about jurisprudence ? 
>>
>
> Only as much as you do.
>  
>
>>  It doesn't care
>> if your motivations were good or evil, it only cares if you
>> broke the law or not.
>>
>
> Did I contradict that somewhere? 
>
>  
>
>>   
>> Serial killers are generally thought to be sociopaths, but
>> they don't usually have much success cooking up an insanity defense.
>>
>
> That's why I said "There may be people who are born sociopaths".
>
>  They are the mindless, heartless purveyors of cruelty and evil,
>> evil as defined by laws. 
>>
>
>  Is evil defined by law? First you say that jurisprudence is all about 
> establishing whether you broke the law, and not whether someone has evil 
> motives, but now you are saying that evil is defined by laws.
>
>   
>> Jurors and judges under the legal system determine if you break laws or 
>> not, 
>> not whether your motivation was good or evil, although that could 
>> have some influence on the type of punishment. 
>>
>
> Yes, so?
>  
>
>>   
>>  
>>  
>> [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net]
>> 1/3/2013 
>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
>>
>> ----- Receiving the following content ----- 
>> *From:* Craig Weinberg 
>> *Receiver:* everything-list 
>> *Time:* 2013-01-02, 12:13:04
>> *Subject:* Re: Re: The evolution of good and evil
>>
>>  
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 6:39:17 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote: 
>>>
>>>  
>>> ROGER: There are two opposing forces in the universe, those which 
>>> enhance 
>>> life, which we call Good, and those which diminish life, which we call 
>>> Evil. 
>>>
>>> CRAIG: I can't relate to cut and dried ideas of Good and Evil or 
>>> enhancing or diminishing of life. 
>>> It seems completely disconnected from reality to me. If it was that 
>>> obvious, why wouldn't 
>>> everyone just do the Good things and avoid Evil things? Obviously our 
>>> experiences have 
>>> many layers and qualities which change dynamically. Anything can be 
>>> interpreted as 
>>> enhancing or diminishing life. Chemotherapy Good or Evil? 
>>>   
>>> ROGER: Good people tend to do good things, evil people to do evil things.
>>>
>>
>> The Stanford Prison Experiment proves that this is not true. There may be 
>> people who are born sociopaths and born humanitarians but overwhelmingly 
>> people's actions are reactions to their circumstances.
>>  
>>
>>>  Chemotherapy is thought to do more good than evil. 
>>>
>>
>> By doctors trying to cure patients of cancer, not by the cells of the 
>> body being poisoned. It sounds like when you say that good enhances life, 
>> you are talking about the lives of human beings and not any other species. 
>> If pressed, I suspect that good is further defined as that which enhances 
>> the lives of human beings which you consider to be good, which will, I 
>> suspect, turn out to be those people with whom you personally relate or 
>> admire. 
>>  
>>
>>>  
>>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> [Roger Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net] 
>>> 1/1/2013 
>>> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Everything List" group. 
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/ePt2Uf7MeNsJ. 
>>>
>>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com. 
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+
>>> unsub...@googlegroups.com. 
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/eo-BouQWicEJ.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/1goybItgwaEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/Aj7-7Np3oUAJ.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to