On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any definition of "soul" you agree with? > Strangely enough there is, the soul is the essential must have part of consciousness, therefore I think that Information is as close as you can get to the traditional concept of the soul and still remain within the scientific method. Consider the similarities: The soul is non material and so is information. It's difficult to pin down a unique physical location for the soul, and the same is true for information. The soul is the essential, must have, part of consciousness, exactly the same situation is true for information. The soul is immortal and so, potentially, is information. But there are also important differences. A soul is unique but information can be duplicated. The soul is and will always remain unfathomable, but information is understandable, in fact, information is the ONLY thing that is understandable. Information unambiguously exists, I don't think anyone would deny that, but if the soul exists (as distinct from information) it will never be proven scientifically. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
