I've been following this group a lot. I read it everyday and enjoy all of
the wonderful stuff that comes up, even if some of it tends towards ad
hominem, argument from authority, and petitio principi. Hey, we're humans,
right? That means we get to make these fallacies, in good conscience or
Anyway, I wondered about what anyone/everyone thought about the notion of
'chosenness' as a way to understand where we are here in the world. It
seems to me that concepts like MWI, Bruno's comp/mech hypothesis and the
'dreams of numbers' ideas of subjectivity, and even Leibniz's 'best of all
possible worlds' don't actually do something like flee away from our
everyday responsibility to accept the basic fact that we have been CHOSEN
-- and when I say this, please don't immediately put a bunch of theological
baggage on it. I'm not saying God chose this reality as opposed to another,
although this might be a convenient shorthand. But what I am saying is
that, out of all the staggering possibilities that we know exist with
regards to our universe, our galaxy, our solar system, our planet, our
society, and even our individual selves, things could have very easily
turned out to be different than they were. The fact that they have turned
out in just this way and not another indicates this kind of chosenness, and
along with it, comes a certain degree of responsibility, I guess?
It seems to me that all the various 'everything' hypotheses (MWI, comp,
Leibniz, and others) try to apply the Copernican principle to its breaking
point. True enough, there is from a purely 3p point of view nothing special
about our cosmic situation re: our planet and our sun. BUT, from an
existential 1p point of view there is a huge privilege that we have, i.e.
we are sentient observers, who love, feel pain, feel desire, and long for
Moreover, the 3p point of view is a pure abstraction, kind of like eating
the picture of a meal rather than the actual meal. How do we know what any
kind of 3p account of truth would be? What would it even look like? A
universe with no observers. A falling tree without a hearer/listener. This,
to me, is nonsense.
Aren't things like MWI of quantum physics and comp hypothesis of universal
dovetailer trying to, at a fundamental and existential level, an attempt to
try to run away from the concreteness and absolute 'givenness' (gift) of
the world as we find it? And isn't our role, in creation, as freely
choosing beings (sorry, John Clark, free will is more than just a noise) to
choose what will make other people with us now and in the future feel more
love and less pain? And isn't this why we were chosen?
I'll go back to lurking now, but I'd appreciate any thoughts you might have
on this reflection of mine.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.