On 3/20/2013 4:01 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
> On 20.03.2013 20:18 meekerdb said the following:
>> On 3/20/2013 2:22 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
>>> On 19.03.2013 22:25 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
>>> I see a bit of irony in the fact that people who believe in
>>> physical reality often call to a principle developed by Occam.
>> What's the irony? Occam is about our theories and models. One
>> generally believes in some reality; that why you develop theories
>> about it and try to model it. I'm not sure what 'physical' adds to
> Let us take an atom as an example (you may replace it by an elementary
> particle or a superstring, your choice). Physicists using such a
> concept usually believe that the atom does exist, aren't they? In this
> sense, physicists are realists.
> At the Occam's time, realists were people who have believed that
> universals exist. Occam has employed his razor to strip universals
> from the reality and his position has led to nominalism. That is,
> universals are just creation of the mind and it does not make sense to
> search for them in the real world.
> Presumably his positions about atoms were the same, an atom is just a
> concept created by the mind - hence it does not make sense to search
> for it in reality. Here is the irony.
I agree! What is almost worse is that immaterialism makes the very
idea that a 'reality' has any existence outside one the mind of the
individual. This makes escape from solipsism impossible.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.