On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think the fact that e^i*PI +1 = 0 surprises almost everyone when they
>> first hear of it.
> > This one is very interesting, but the fact that Pi was a poor choice for
> the constant makes the equation considerably more ugly than it should be.
> There is a growing movement to usurp the number Pi with the much more
> important constant "2*Pi" (see: http://www.math.utah.edu/~palais/pi.html ).
> If we call that new number tau (t). Then Euler's identity becomes:
> e^(t * i) = 1
There is no disputing matters of taste but I think the original equation is
more beautiful because it shows a relationship between 5 of the most
important numbers in all of mathematics. Your new equation only has 4
important numbers, it doesn't include zero, it has the multiplicative
identity but not the additive identity.
John K Clark
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.