On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps this suits you better then: e^(t*i) = 1 + 0 >
As I say there is no disputing matters of taste, but for me the first time I saw e^i*PI +1 = 0 the zero came as a complete surprise and that added greatly to its beauty, but I would never have been surprised that 1 = 1 + 0. The zero in your equation seems like a unnecessary curlicue but the original equation had every symbol that needed to be there and not one more. 1*E +0 = 1*MC^2 +0 just doesn't have the sex appeal of Einstein's original E=MC^2. John K Clark > > Jason > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
