On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you want to see all the constants at once there is an easy >>> correction: e^(t*i) - 1 = 0 >>> >> >> Then it has the additive identity but not the multiplicative identity >> and I still prefer Euler's original. >> >> > > What is the mutliplicative identity in the original that is missing from > this one? > 1. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
