On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you want to see all the constants at once there is an easy
>>> correction: e^(t*i) - 1 = 0
>> Then it has the additive identity but not the multiplicative identity
>> and I still prefer Euler's original.
> What is the mutliplicative identity in the original that is missing from
> this one?
John K Clark
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.