True. Statistics are useful for a short period of time. But evolutionary biology has nothing to do with short periods of time
2013/9/10 meekerdb <[email protected]> > On 9/10/2013 3:38 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote: > > It was zero. but the evolutiometrist said me a few decades ago that my > fitness was certainly 10. > > That is why I said that either this measure is flawed or alternatively, if > it is accurate (like this), it is useless (as a durable parameter to > predict something) > > > That's like saying statistics are useless because it's not always right. > > Brent > "The race is not always to the swift nor battle to the strong...but that's > the way to bet." > --- Ring Lardner > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Alberto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
