On 06 Dec 2013, at 20:33, Jason Resch wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>
On 05 Dec 2013, at 19:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/5/2013 2:15 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
In measure theory ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)
) just because there are an infinite number does not mean they
are equal. Your measure each time you pull the trigger in the
quantum gun is (approximately) halved.
Your relative measure on the continuations where you survive
remains constant and equal to one. We cannot count the cul-de-sac
reality (and that is why Bp & Dt can give a quantum measure). Some
absolute measure does not make sense.
Why not? It measures something different, but I don't see why it
"doesn't make sense".
Describe an experience which gives sense to absolute measure.
Isn't this required to prove comp, by looking at the results of
running the UD for a long time?
Not at all. The probabilities are 1p, and always relative to the state
you are in. You never look at the running of the UD for a long time.
You are always confronted with its entire infinite running (in
ASSA can be used to justify some geographic matter. But the extraction
of the physical laws (and more) is based entirely on the relative
first person SSA.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.