# Re: How can a grown man be an atheist ?

```On 12/16/2013 9:49 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
```

```

```
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:45 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:
```
On 12/16/2013 8:52 PM, LizR wrote:
```
```    On 17 December 2013 16:22, Stephen Paul King <stephe...@provensecure.com
<mailto:stephe...@provensecure.com>> wrote:

Dear LizR,

That is exactly the point that I wanted to make: 'There couldn't be an
observer in such a universe, it's far too simple." There could not be
one
wherefore "he could deduce the existence of 17 theoretically, and work
out its
properties" is impossible: probability zero.

I can't see the significance of this argument. If we take a large enough
number,
say 10^80, that observers /can /exist, we can then ask whether such
observers could
work out the properties of numbers greater than 10^80.
```
```
Can we?  Whenever I add 1 to 10^80 I get 10^80 in spite of Peano.

```
Use a programming language such as python or Java which supports big integers. It will let you add 1 to 10^80.
```
```
I know. I was just taking 10^80 to mean "a very big number" which of course depends on context. I generally do applied physics and engineering and so 10^80+1 = 10^80 for physical variables.
```
Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email