On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Stephen Paul King < stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason, > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Stephen Paul King < >> stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: >> >>> Yes, but why are you being anthropocentric? >>> >> >> I thought that was your position, or at least (observer-centric), in that >> numbers only have properties when observed/checked/computed by some entity >> somewhere. >> > > No, I am just trying to be consistent. If we make a claim, than that > claim is possibly true iff its consequences can be actually observed, > otherwise we are merely confused. > As in my example of the slug, we may be confused, but that doesn't mean everyone everywhere is. We can't use our own local ignorance as the basis for what is real or unreal, true or not true. > > > >> >> >>> If there can exist a physical process that is a bisimulation of the >>> computation of the test for primeness, then the primeness is true. >>> Otherwise, we are merely guessing, at best. >>> >> >> When we check the primaility of some number N, we may not know whether or >> not it is prime. However, eventually we run the computation and find out >> either it was, or it wasn't. >> > > Without the actual proof, what is there? > Truth. Truth =/= Proof. > > > >> >> My question to you is when was it determined that N was or was not >> prime? Any time we re-check the calculation we get the same result. >> Presumably even causally isolated observers will also get the same result. >> If humans get wiped out and cuttlefish take over the world and build >> computers, and they check to see if N, is prime is it possible for them to >> get a different result? >> > > How could I possibly know? It is not my burden to show. > It is something your world view ought to be able to account for rationally or meaningfully, otherwise you might look to replace that world view with one which can more adequately address these questions. > I am only claiming that if an actual computation of the primeness is not > done then the plain cannot be true in that universe, otherwise we are > appealing to a consciousness that is somehow beyond computation. > I don't understand your point. How are we appealing to a consciousness beyond computation by assuming a number can be prime or not prime irrespective of our capability or willingness to prove it? Let me ask two questions which might help clarify my understanding of your view: 1. Is it possible for someone, in some universe, somewhere to compute (without error) and find some number N to be prime, while another person elsewhere finds it is not prime? 2. If your answer to question 1 is "no", then what is the mechanism through which consistency is maintained between these causally isolated observers (who may even be in different universes?) > > > >> >> My contention is that it is not possible to get a different result, that >> N was always prime, or it was always not prime, and it would be prime (or >> not prime) even if we lacked the means or inclination to check it. >> > > Such is unprovable. Merely claiming that some X has some property does not > make it so. > If it did not already have the property X before it was observed, then why is it that aliens a trillion light years beyond our cosmological horizon get the same result when they compute whether or not N is prime? Does the first entity to compute it "collapse the mathematical wave function"? Jason > > > >> >> >> Jason >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> So you are arguing that doing the computations is what makes a number >>>> prime or not? >>>> >>>> When does the number first become prime, is it when the first person >>>> anywhere in the universe checks it? What about people beyond the >>>> cosmological horizon that compute it, or what about people in hypothetical >>>> other universes? Does the first person ever to check and verify that a >>>> number is prime, make it prime for all people, in all universes, forever? >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Stephen Paul King < >>>> stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I do not assume that computations can occur if there are no physical >>>>> means to implement them. My imagination that s 270 digit string is prime >>>>> is >>>>> not equivalent to actually doing the computation that tests for primeness. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Stephen Paul King < >>>>>> stephe...@provensecure.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> No, your making the mistake of identifying a representation of a >>>>>>> thing with the thing. The symbol 10^80 does not have 10^80 components, >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> to act as it is does... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Tell me this, is the following (270 digit) number prime: >>>>>> >>>>>> 332694894848329434549105787414873502606112802712440024745636803095039036420080826797726325643727533347094562684200739500429461145303257192536463211027218435305302565244506232330240506160052373297550819467601665370364223791626506805746132690937677414 >>>>>> 846877090853919880937 >>>>>> >>>>>> Either it is or it isn't. If it is, then this is no different from >>>>>> the case of 17 being prime (even if the universe had only 16 objects). >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>> the Google Groups "Everything List" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/1NWmK1IeadI/unsubscribe >>>>>> . >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com >>>>>> . >>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Kindest Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Stephen Paul King >>>>> >>>>> Senior Researcher >>>>> >>>>> Mobile: (864) 567-3099 >>>>> >>>>> stephe...@provensecure.com >>>>> >>>>> http://www.provensecure.us/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use >>>>> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain >>>>> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and >>>>> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as >>>>> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are >>>>> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of >>>>> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>>>> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message >>>>> immediately.” >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/1NWmK1IeadI/unsubscribe >>>> . >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Kindest Regards, >>> >>> Stephen Paul King >>> >>> Senior Researcher >>> >>> Mobile: (864) 567-3099 >>> >>> stephe...@provensecure.com >>> >>> http://www.provensecure.us/ >>> >>> >>> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use >>> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain >>> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and >>> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as >>> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are >>> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of >>> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message >>> immediately.” >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/1NWmK1IeadI/unsubscribe >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > > Kindest Regards, > > Stephen Paul King > > Senior Researcher > > Mobile: (864) 567-3099 > > stephe...@provensecure.com > > http://www.provensecure.us/ > > > “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of > the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and > exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as > attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message > immediately.” > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
