John, You are talking about clock time simultaneity which is well understood in relativity and which I accept and my theory is completely compatible with. Clock time simultaneity has nothing to do with the present moment which is an entirely separate type of time I call P-time. This is clear because observers with different clock time t values always inhabit the exact same present moment, the exact same moment of P-time which corresponds to the actual universal common present moment which is the only time in which reality exists.
The present moment is the most fundamental self-evident experience of our existence. And it is quite clear that all observers, no matter what their t values, all exist within this same P-time present moment. Edgar On Monday, December 23, 2013 2:10:13 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > > All, > > The proof is simply the fact that the time traveling twins meet up again > with different clock times, but always in the exact same present moment. > This proves beyond any doubt there are two kinds of time, clock time which > varies by relativistic observer, and the time of the present moment (what I > call P-time) which is absolute and common to all observers across the > universe. > > When this is realized there are a number of profound implications. > > First that time travel outside the common present moment is impossible > since all of reality (the entire universe) exists within/is the common > present moment. The only time travel that is possible is having different > clock times within the same shared present moment. > > Second, that this is compatible with only one cosmological geometry, named > that the universe is a 4-dimensional hypersphere with P-time (not clock > time) as its continually extending radial dimension. That is cosmological > space is positively curved and finite. In fact we all see all 4-dimensions > of this geometry all the time and visually verify this, as the radial > P-time dimension is seen as distance in every direction from every point in > the 3-dimensional space of the hypersphere's surface. > > What amazes me is that no one recognized this simple obvious fact prior to > my stating it in my 1997 paper 'Spacetime and Consciousness'. It's a great > example of how the trivially obvious can remain unrecognized, no matter how > important, if it isn't part of the accepted world view of, in this case, > either common sense or science..... > > Edgar > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
